In the software development life cycle (SDLC), manual testing is a method wherein human testers manually carry out test cases. They then watch how the software behaves in relation to the requirements or user stories in order to find errors, faults, and other issues.

Before the program is made available to clients, manual testing will be conducted by entering data, clicking buttons, and examining the results to make sure they function as intended.

Manual testing advantages

High Degree of Flexibility 

The flexibility of manual testing allows for easy adaptation to changing conditions and requirements.

Economical: 

Because it doesn't require any specialist equipment or software, manual testing is an affordable choice for smaller projects.

Human instinct: 

Automated testing technologies may miss possible problems that human testers can spot with their experience and intuition.

Enhanced comprehension of end users 

By using manual testing, testers can find problems that could affect the user experience and obtain a deeper understanding of the viewpoint of end users.

Better record-keeping 

Testers who use manual testing must record their results, which can enhance the software's overall quality and documentation.

Manual testing Disadvantages

Time-consuming: 

When several testers are involved or the project is larger, manual testing might take a long time.

Error by human: 

Human error can occur during manual testing, and certain defects or issues may go unnoticed.

restricted scalability 

Large applications or systems can be difficult to test with manual testing since it is not scalable.

restricted repeatability 

Replicating the results of manual testing can be challenging, which makes it more difficult to guarantee constant quality over time.

Insufficient test coverage 

Certain test scenarios and edge situations might not be covered by manual testing, which could result in certain defects going undetected.

Conclusion

In conclusion, one of the most important components of assuring software quality is still Manual testing in software testing. Because of its hands-on approach, every capability can be carefully examined to make sure it meets the necessary standards. Human intuition, cost-effectiveness for smaller projects, and flexibility to change requirements are some benefits of manual testing. It does have certain drawbacks, though, including labor-intensive procedures, a high resource requirement, and the possibility of human error. Finding the ideal balance between automated and human testing is essential since both approaches work best when combined to produce software that is dependable and strong. Comprehensive quality assurance in the dynamic world of software development requires an understanding of the subtleties of Testing in manual testing.